Tag Archives: Father

Our Involvement in the Origin of Sin

Editor’s Note:  This is the continuation of the previous blog post.

Why couldn’t each of us have had the opportunity to make up his or her own mind? Some optimists say that a baby born has as much choice as Adam.  Suppose that were true.  It wouldn’t matter much.  A baby still wouldn’t have a chance.  The problem is still there.  Everything is against it.  It is surrounded by sinful people.  This unity of the human race was intended for good — the fact that we are all in it together.  Let us suppose now that Adam had kept the so called “covenant of works” and had resisted Satan, then you and I wouldn’t have had to undergo the test.  We would have been born incapable to sin.  If that was the case, no one would protest and say “I want to decide this for myself.  I want to have the chance of failure.” In spite of Adam’s fall we have many advantages because Adam is our father.  Suppose if one of us had to start from scratch and say “I don’t want to receive anything from my forefathers.”  If we did we would be living in caves and wearing furs — if we were fortunate enough to kill an animal.  Even if we lived a long life we wouldn’t ever be able to begin to invent anything, electricity and the like.  No one generation would live long enough on the earth to accomplish an invention.  That is in spite of all of the sin in the world.  God intended that the unanimity of the human race would be the source of endless good.  Satan took advantage of this wonderful society.  Hence the sins of the fathers must be upon the children.  Years ago if the well in your back yard was contaminated you would ask your neighbor if you could take some water from his well.  Each well had an individual source.  If the city water supply’s contaminated I couldn’t go next door and use their faucet for some good water, because it all comes from the same source.

Here is a wonderful thing.  God always has the last word.  He did in the case of Cain and Abel, and again with Eve — faith handed down.  When God said, “In pain and sorrow shall you bring forth children,” he was speaking a fact, rather than a curse.  It is by means of motherhood that a Savior came.  The angels all fell individually and they stayed fallen — no Jesus could come because they had no children and because there is no family.

Christ could have come into the world and still no one would be saved.  God has to change a heart.  We have to be born twice, and here is an amazing thing:  God can choose whomever he wants.  He doesn’t blindfold himself and pick us at random.  He works along family lines.

The form of baptism [in the Christian Reformed Church] isn’t inspired but it is inspiring.  “Although our children do not understand these things, we may not therefore exclude them from baptism, since they are without their knowledge partakers of the condemnation in Adam, and so again are received unto grace in Christ; as God speaks unto Abraham, the father of all believers, and therefore also to us and our children, saying; ‘I will establish my covenant between me and thee and thy seed after thee throughout their their generation for an everlasting covenant, to be a God unto thee and to thy seed after thee.’ ” (Gen. 17:7)

Lest someone say, “Oh, that is the Old Testament dispensation,” it is also in the New Testament where Peter says in Acts 2:39, “For to you is the promise, and to your children, and to all that are afar off, even as many as the Lord our God shall call unto Him.”


Our God Is One

The Holy Spirit also bears witness to us.      Hebrews 10:15

It seems strange that so “spiritual” a book as Hebrews should contain so little reference to the Holy Spirit.  Perhaps we think this, however, because we often mistake God to be three individual Gods.  Such a crude conception of God is tritheism — the belief that God the Father, God the Son, and God the Holy Spirit are separate.

The Bible tells us that there is one God — and that He became a man.  That man is Jesus Christ. When He completed His work on earth, Jesus promised not to abandon His followers but to be with them to the close of the age (Matthew 28:20).  And His presence among His followers was realized when the Holy Spirit came to live within the church (Acts 2).

The Bible tells us that the Holy Spirit comes from the Father and the Son and is often called the Spirit of Christ.  Paul uses this term repeatedly.  In 2 Corinthians 3:17 we read: “Now the Lord is the Spirit, and where the Spirit of the Lord is, there is freedom.”

It is absurd to say that we are making too much of the Holy Spirit nowadays.  When we think about the Holy Spirit, Jesus says, we are worshiping Him (Jesus), and whoever honors Jesus honors God.  The Father, Son, and Holy Spirit, then, are one.  To this, Jesus adds that even we are one with Him (John 17:20-26).

The Beginning of Nations

The sons of Noah, who went forth from the ark, were Shem, Ham, and Japheth.  Ham was the father of Canaan…..from these the whole earth was peopled.      Genesis 9:18,19

A few people have the absurd ideas that one of Noah’s sons was black, another white, and the third must have been a kind of mixture to take care of the Indians, Orientals, and all the rest.  We smile at such nonsense, yet we often forget that all the races did descend ultimately from one man, Noah, so that we are all cousins under the skin.

What is more, the entire matter of skin color is so confusing that we do not know who is what.  Noah was almost certainly not white.  Many so-called white people are darker than those we classify as black.  And no anthropologist knows exactly what a race is.  Nothing made Hitler appear more absurd in the eyes of intelligent people that his notion that he knew what a Aryan was, plus his insistence that the Aryans are a superior race.

It is a simple Bible fact that Canaan, the grandson whom Noah prophetically cursed, had nothing to do with black people, for the Canaanites did not live in Africa.  It is also a fact that the Jewish descendants of Shem, who was the most blessed of Noah’s sons, were slaves for hundreds of years.  Even more amazing, they were slaves to descendants of Ham, who was the rascal in Genesis 9:18-29.

The important question is not who is a person’s physical father, but, who is his spiritual father?  (John 1:12, 8:44)

Baptism, continued (The Sacraments, Part II)

Baptism “in the name of the Father, Son and Holy Spirit” can also mean nothing more than the washing away of sins, which for many people is all that salvation amounts to; a kind of ticket to heaven, which is about what the word “sacrament” really means.  It is better to use such a word as “ordinance”, a practice or ritual which our Lord ordained, instituted.

Again, if this is all that baptism represents, it might be well if we were baptized more than once, for we all keep sinning even after our regeneration, all of which sins have to be forgiven.  Some early Christians put off baptism until death was imminent (since repeated baptism was not allowed then any more than now), and the Catholic custom of extreme unction, a form of baptism or anointing at the end of life, has something of that early Church idea behind it.  (Accuracy recommends stating that this 7th of the Roman Catholic sacraments originated in the good advice of James 5:15 as to anointing the sick.  This practice is sadly neglected in all communions.)  Jesus indicated our need of repeated or continuous washing in his example of foot-washing in the Upper Room (same hour that he instituted the Lord’s Supper), and it may seriously be considered whether that pious practice on the part of some churches ought not be a third sacrament for all of us.  The Bible does not say how many sacraments there ought to be, or what constitutes one.  If it be said that sacraments have to do with our relation to God, the answer is that the Lord’s Supper has a horizontal dimension as well, and most sins, for which we have to be forgiven, are committed against our fellow human beings. (Without adding another sacrament we might well imitate the Roman Catholic Church by sprinkling ourselves [!] with water at such times as entering worship services.  While this does not depict the reciprocal nature of our repeated sinning and need of mutual forgiveness, it is an apt picture of its continuing persistence as well as God’s ongoing  forgiveness.)

But in that same situation in which Jesus washed his disciples’ feet, he said plainly that there is a once and for all cleansing that makes any exact repetition unnecessary and superfluous. (John 13:10)  This was pictured in the Old Testament by the fact that in addition to the daily ablutions of hands and feet by the priests, at their ordination there was an elaborate ceremony in which they were completely bathed, shaved, and put on clean clothes.  It should be remembered – which some of the early Christians forgot – that our baptism, much like the cleansing stream that followed the Israelites in the wilderness, is a continuous thing, constantly washing and refreshing us as we move along through life. (I john 1:9)  In fact, as we all should know, future sins are forgiven by Christ’s one-time atonement as well as those of the past.  In making this point plain the writer to Hebrews asks the rhetorical question, “How many times do you think Christ was or has to be crucified in our stead?”

All this would certainly recommend immersion as a more appropriate mode of baptism than either sprinkling or pouring.  While it may not be warranted to say that immersion is the only permissible mode of baptism, if baptism represented nothing more than complete washing or cleansing from sin, it is a rather inadequate sign (poor picture) to have a baptizee touched on the head with little more than a moist finger, and even that hardly visible  to the “witnesses” outside the immediate huddle around the fount.  Many ministers are making the ceremony more visible, which is the purpose of it all; they should be encouraged to sprinkle the symbolic water on the hands and feet of the recipient as well as the head.  Are we not enjoined to present our entire bodies as living sacrifices, and do we not sing, “Take my hands…. my feet…..”?

But there is something else that the once-ness of baptism (whatever the mode) is supposed to represent, and that is our personal spiritual death and resurrection at the time Christ died and rose again, which is made literal at the time of our second birth and death to “self”, and becomes a matter of consciousness and experience as we reach maturity and discover for ourselves who we are, essentially.  There is no need to argue that for Paul this is the primary meaning of baptism.  (See Romans 6:3,4)  Jesus, of course, spoke of his death as a baptism.  (Cf  II Cor 4:10)

This being so, immersion – which happily symbolizes completeness of cleansing – would seem to be the most preferable mode of baptism on the score of its representation of burial and resurrection.  Certainly the baptismal formula should be stated exactly the way it is correctly written in Christ’s command, “I baptize you into the name of the Father, Son and Holy Spirit”.  Any child knows that “the name of” is identical with the person who bears it, so that what we are saying at baptism is the person is symbolically engrafted into Christ, becomes one with him and through him with God, as Jesus prayed at the conclusion of the first Lord’s Supper.

In the Old Covenant (Testament) which is a type of the New, the symbolic death of both parties was an important element that we overlook in both the type and its fulfillment.  Parties to a solemn covenant would mix a little blood of each, as pledge of their lives to each other, and invoking death upon either or both in the event of violation.

Next post:  The Lord’s Supper (Part I), a continuation of “The Sacraments”